| 1 |
> |
| 2 |
> Will rm -Rf /proc hose a system? I didn't run rm -Rf /proc directly, |
| 3 |
> but I did do it indirectly. I had mount --bind /proc /mnt/gentoo/proc |
| 4 |
> and then forgot about it. I then ran rm -Rf /mnt/gentoo to start a |
| 5 |
> stage 3 again forgetting that /boot and /proc were both mount |
| 6 |
> --bind[ed] to /mnt/gentoo. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Could this hose my system? I don't want to reboot yet if it could. I |
| 9 |
> want to fix what ever I can. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Grrr, I just looked and /boot/ is wiped clean! I guess I can redo grub |
| 12 |
> and I still have my kernel under /usr/src. What about /proc? Would |
| 13 |
> running rm -Rf /proc kill anything? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
mlaptop proc # rm -rfv /proc/config.gz |
| 16 |
rm: cannot remove `/proc/config.gz': Operation not permitted |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
are you sure ? proc is like a dynamic filesystem they aren't really files |
| 19 |
just virtual files that the kernel are displaying ... if you some how have |
| 20 |
whiped proc you can probuly just ... |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
mount -o remount /proc |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
n it will be fine... |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
give ... |
| 27 |
mkdir /mnt/proc |
| 28 |
mount -t proc proc /mnt/proc |
| 29 |
a little seein' too ;) |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
but no you should be fine .. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
as for /boot .. you silly billy :) hehe! |
| 34 |
and just be thankful you didn't get the wrong terminal and remove your |
| 35 |
current filesystem, lol |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Matt. |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> Jim |
| 40 |
> -- |
| 41 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
-- |
| 47 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives