Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dave Nebinger <dnebinger@××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] syslog-ng can't be removed by rc-update
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:33:51
Message-Id: 200510191425.48832.dnebinger@joat.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] syslog-ng can't be removed by rc-update by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Wednesday 19 October 2005 02:08 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 13:22:45 -0400 Dave Nebinger <dnebinger@××××.com>
3 >
4 > wrote:
5 > | Okay, I'll bite, why shouldn't it? If the package is unmerged, why
6 > | would this file be kept on the system?
7 >
8 > CONFIG_PROTECT.
9 >
10 > If you think that the default behaviour is silly, try something like
11 > this in your make.conf:
12 >
13 > CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/init.d /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb"
14
15 No, I don't think it is silly, but based on a discussion on gentoo-dev
16 recently I was under the impression it was not enabled by default (as I
17 remember the poster was asking everyone to turn on config_protect to see if
18 there were any other relevant defects that needed to be identified).
19 --
20 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] syslog-ng can't be removed by rc-update Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>