| 1 |
Michael wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Saturday, 12 March 2022 01:34:45 GMT Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Howdy, |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> I just noticed this in my updates: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> [ebuild U ] sys-devel/llvm-13.0.1:13::gentoo [13.0.0:13::gentoo] |
| 8 |
>> USE="binutils-plugin%* libffi ncurses xml -debug -doc -exegesis -libedit |
| 9 |
>> -test -xar -z3 (-gold%*)" ABI_X86="32 (64) (-x32)" |
| 10 |
>> LLVM_TARGETS="(AArch64*) (AMDGPU) (ARM*) (AVR*) (BPF) (Hexagon*) |
| 11 |
>> (Lanai*) (MSP430*) (Mips*) (NVPTX) (PowerPC*) (RISCV*) (Sparc*) |
| 12 |
>> (SystemZ*) (WebAssembly*) (X86) (XCore*) (-ARC) (-CSKY) (-M68k) (-VE)" |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> The LLVM_TARGETS= part looks odd. Why do I need ARM, PowerPC, Sparc etc |
| 15 |
>> here? Is that correct? The old still installed version doesn't have |
| 16 |
>> those enabled. |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> Thanks. |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>> Dale |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
>> :-) :-) |
| 23 |
> You don't need any of these targets in llvm and clang any more than I do. |
| 24 |
> There's a bug which explains why these arch targets are now being forced, but |
| 25 |
> I can't find it. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
That was my thinking when I saw it. It just looked odd to me. I found |
| 29 |
this bug. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/767700 |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Is that the one? It mentions the target but I don't quite understand |
| 34 |
the why. The biggest thing, will this break something if I let it do |
| 35 |
it? I don't have any settings of my own on this package. It was done |
| 36 |
by a dev, who I assume has a good reason for this. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Dale |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
:-) :-) |
Archives