1 |
On 11/10/2014 10:48 AM, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> I wouldn't worry about it at all, there is no way *sys-fs/udev |
3 |
> ebuild* will ever need systemd. There might be a news item later, |
4 |
> with instructions on moving to something else, but that's not |
5 |
> something we are even planning at the moment, so sys-fs/udev is still |
6 |
> the de facto proper upstream /dev manager. |
7 |
|
8 |
Well, that sounds reassuring, so thanks very much for this and you're |
9 |
hard work for all of us non-programmer gentoo users, it is much appreciated! |
10 |
|
11 |
I guess Lennart was just using words that I read the wrong way... even |
12 |
now if I re-read his posts, it sounds to me like he is saying 'no more |
13 |
separate udev without systemd ultimately'... and I know for sure he has |
14 |
made exactly this comments in the past, but that was admittedly 1 year |
15 |
or two ago... |