1 |
On 5/27/06, JimD <Jim@×××××××××××××××××.org> wrote: |
2 |
> Richard Fish wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > I'll let you know in a week or so once my emerge -e world finishes... :-) |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Same here. Rebuilding world should take a while. |
7 |
|
8 |
Hold the phone!! OOo just completed building on my system in 4h 08m |
9 |
07s. When I get some time I'm going to have try that again with gcc |
10 |
3.4.6 for a comparison... |
11 |
|
12 |
> > Actually the last time I did this, it took about 16 hours to rebuild |
13 |
> > everything....of course that was with openoffice-bin which I don't use |
14 |
> > anymore. Building OOo from source should add about 7 hours. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Do you find any benefit from building OOo yourself? I built OOo once |
17 |
> about 2 years ago, and it took ages then. Since then I have always just |
18 |
> use OOo-bin. |
19 |
|
20 |
Mostly size. From my quickpkg collection: |
21 |
|
22 |
carcharias All # bzcat openoffice-bin-2.0.2.tbz2 | wc -c |
23 |
bzcat: openoffice-bin-2.0.2.tbz2: trailing garbage after EOF ignored |
24 |
317675520 |
25 |
carcharias All # bzcat openoffice-2.0.2-r2.tbz2 | wc -c |
26 |
bzcat: openoffice-2.0.2-r2.tbz2: trailing garbage after EOF ignored |
27 |
286371840 |
28 |
|
29 |
Saved about 40M by compiling myself, by eliminating the duplicate |
30 |
stuff in /usr/lib/openoffice (e.g., python). |
31 |
|
32 |
But I have been loading OOo2 at login using the 'ooffice2 -nologo |
33 |
-nodefault' method, so I didn't see (or expect to see) any |
34 |
improvements in startup speed. It is already typically one second or |
35 |
less on my system. |
36 |
|
37 |
-Richard |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |