1 |
On 08/04/2015 11:30 AM, Felix Miata wrote: |
2 |
> Grant Edwards composed on 2015-08-04 17:20 (UTC): |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> and faster. A fresh install will take a couple hours. An upgrade will |
5 |
>> take somewhere between a couple days and a couple weeks. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Seriously, more than a day? |
8 |
> |
9 |
|
10 |
Oh sure, it's possible. |
11 |
|
12 |
In late 2013 I upgraded some old installs installed in 2007/2008. They |
13 |
were left stagnant for a long time due to some really finicky software |
14 |
(tried an upgrade and it broke so many things on that software it wasn't |
15 |
funny.) |
16 |
|
17 |
However, this process took almost a week to iron the bugs out. |
18 |
|
19 |
Portage had a bit of a fit and refused to do anything. There were so |
20 |
many changes with core things (like udev, python, perl, and numerous |
21 |
others) that it just crapped out. |
22 |
|
23 |
I found that I had to do it in little pieces at a time and portage got |
24 |
in my way constantly. I wish there was a setting to just forcibly |
25 |
compile a package and then manually deal with breakage afterward with |
26 |
something like revdep-rebuild, rather than trying to solve problems it |
27 |
can't deal with beforehand. It would have been a lot easier. |
28 |
|
29 |
So after upgrading some core items which took several hours of figuring |
30 |
out what to remove, what to upgrade, and what to switch to (in some |
31 |
cases) then I could install a new kernel and boot, after that I still |
32 |
had portage getting in the way and wound up installing packages manually |
33 |
instead of emerging world. |
34 |
|
35 |
I would've just started fresh if the software package I was using |
36 |
actually had an installer that worked. I had to do a lot of tricks to |
37 |
get it installed initially and didn't want to repeat that process. |
38 |
|
39 |
Dan |