| 1 |
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 05:11:47PM +0100, Florian Philipp wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > Since I am planning to encrypt only home/ under LVM control, what kind |
| 4 |
> > of overhead should I expect? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> What do you mean with overhead? CPU utilization? In that case the |
| 7 |
> overhead is minimal, especially when you run a 64-bit kernel with the |
| 8 |
> optimized AES kernel module. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Speaking of that... |
| 11 |
I always wondered what the exact difference was between AES and AES i586. I |
| 12 |
can gather myself that it's about optimisation for a specific architecture. |
| 13 |
But which one would be best for my i686 Core 2 Duo? |
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla' |
| 16 |
I forbid any use of my email addresses with Facebook services. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
A pessimist is an optimist who's given it some thought. |
Archives