1 |
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 09:24:54AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: |
2 |
> I want to explain about the recent openrc's going directly to stable. |
3 |
> |
4 |
> The team had been testing from the previous stable, 0.9.x series all the |
5 |
> way through 0.10.x. We found out recently that releng needed the new |
6 |
> openrc stable because of the cds/isos being broken. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> There hadn't been bugs reported, so we started attempting to stabilize |
9 |
> 0.11.5 so that we could have a stable newer OpenRC for releng. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> When we started stabling, more regressions came up, so we had to fix |
12 |
> those. That is why you are seeing several versions go to stable |
13 |
> directly on some arch's arch's. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> wrt 0.11.7, a couple of developers looked over the patches with me and |
16 |
> we did not see issues. 0.11.8 will be the very last one of these to go |
17 |
> stable. Please bear with me on this. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Thanks, |
20 |
> |
21 |
> William |
22 |
|
23 |
Thanks for this notice, William ... good work! |
24 |
-- |
25 |
Happy Penguin Computers >') |
26 |
126 Fenco Drive ( \ |
27 |
Tupelo, MS 38801 ^^ |
28 |
support@×××××××××××××××××××××.com |
29 |
662-269-2706 662-205-6424 |
30 |
http://happypenguincomputers.com/ |
31 |
|
32 |
Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting |