| 1 |
On Oct 26, 2012 6:14 AM, "Michael Mol" <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> On Oct 25, 2012 10:08 AM, "Michael Mol" <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 7 |
>> > |
| 8 |
>> > |
| 9 |
>> > http://lwn.net/Articles/521022/ |
| 10 |
>> > |
| 11 |
>> > Links to relevant analysis. Useful comments. 'nuff said. |
| 12 |
>> > |
| 13 |
>> > -- |
| 14 |
>> > :wq |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> Nice find, thanks. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> They have an RSS feed. Good stuff. I heard about this before it hit |
| 20 |
Slashdot or Phoronix. The subscriber stuff is _truly_ good. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Thanks! |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
>> |
| 26 |
>> But the update to that article which gave a link to Theo T'so email is |
| 27 |
quite unnerving. He said that his initial hypothesis had not been proven |
| 28 |
and he himself is back in the dark. |
| 29 |
>> |
| 30 |
>> Not much confidence in ext4 for the time being for me. Back to reiserfs? |
| 31 |
;-) |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> Consider the trillions of operational hours of ext4 without |
| 34 |
incident...you're just trolling. |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
I plead guilty, your honor :-P |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
Okay, I'm not serious about dumping ext4 for ReiserFS. But my confidence is |
| 40 |
still shaken. I'm going to implement a more severe watch+backup strategy |
| 41 |
for all ext4 partitions. |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
Rgds, |
| 44 |
-- |
Archives