| 1 |
On Sat, 18 Mar 2017 22:31:44 +0000, Neil Bothwick (neil@××××××××××.uk) |
| 2 |
wrote about "Re: [gentoo-user] modules-load restart" (in |
| 3 |
<20170318223144.17e0e31f@××××××××××.uk>): |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> On Fri, 17 Mar 2017 17:28:27 +0000, David W Noon wrote: |
| 6 |
[snip] |
| 7 |
>> Otherwise the second assignment deletes the module list from the first |
| 8 |
>> assignment. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> If that were true, it87 would be the only module loaded, not the only |
| 11 |
> module not loaded. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
It depends on the order of assignments. I am not certain Thelma provided |
| 14 |
the file in the same order as it was when the problem first arose. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> The comments in the file show multiple module definitions without |
| 17 |
> explicitly adding the previous values. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Those examples are singletons. They show how to incorporate various |
| 20 |
levels of version/release information into the assignments. They are not |
| 21 |
a sequence of related assignments. |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Regards, |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Dave [RLU #314465] |
| 26 |
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* |
| 27 |
dwnoon@××××××××.com (David W Noon) |
| 28 |
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* |
Archives