| 1 |
On Dec 13, 2007 3:57 PM, Jason Carson <jay@××××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I was reading this article (http://lwn.net/Articles/114770/) which says... |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
The article is very old, take a look at this, newer one: |
| 6 |
http://www.redhat.com/magazine/008jun05/features/schedulers/ |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> AS (Anticipatory Scheduler) still seems to be better for desktop systems |
| 10 |
> and IDE disks |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> ... I have a server, not a desktop system but am using an IDE disk so |
| 13 |
> which scheduler is better for a server. Should I stay with anticipatory |
| 14 |
> because I am using an IDE disk or switch to something else because my |
| 15 |
> system is a server? |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> > 071213 Jason Carson wrote: |
| 19 |
> >> Where in 'make menuconfig' do I find the choice for schedulers. |
| 20 |
> >> The one I am currently using is "Anticipatory". |
| 21 |
> >> What is the newest and latest scheduler for 2.6.23? |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> > Try '/sched', which will get you started & lead you to |
| 24 |
> > 'Enable block layer -> IO Schedulers -> whatever you want'. |
| 25 |
> > '?' get you help on the options ... |
| 26 |
> > |
| 27 |
> > I seem to be using 'CFQ', which is apparently the default: |
| 28 |
> > my desktop system is performing admirably. |
| 29 |
> > |
| 30 |
> > -- |
| 31 |
> > ========================,,============================================ |
| 32 |
> > SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : purslow@××××××××××××××.ca |
| 33 |
> > ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies |
| 34 |
> > TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto |
| 35 |
> > -- |
| 36 |
> > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| 37 |
> > |
| 38 |
> > |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> -- |
| 42 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
> |
Archives