| 1 |
Hi all, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
I thought I'd posted about this way back when I opened the bug at |
| 4 |
sourceforge: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3494798&group_id=80013&atid=558446 |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
but didn't find anything in my local archives, so I guess I didn't... |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Does anyone use clucene? I'm planning on enabling FTS (full text search) |
| 11 |
on a new dovecot server, and was planning on using clucene, but would |
| 12 |
like to see about getting this warning taken care of (if it is indedd |
| 13 |
something I need to be worried about)... |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I only got one response on the bug tracker (a month after my original |
| 16 |
report, and that only after I pinged for a reply) saying they weren't |
| 17 |
doing much work on it at the moment and that they'd look into it in a |
| 18 |
few days, then nothing - and that was back in March. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Here is the warning: |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
QA Notice: Package triggers severe warnings which indicate that it |
| 23 |
may exhibit random runtime failures. |
| 24 |
/var/tmp/portage/dev-cpp/clucene-2.3.3.4-r4/work/clucene-core-2.3.3.4/src/core/CLucene/index/DocumentsWriter.cpp:129:33: |
| 25 |
warning: passing NULL to non-pointer argument 2 of ‘void* memset(void*, |
| 26 |
int, size_t)’ |
| 27 |
Please do not file a Gentoo bug and instead report the above QA |
| 28 |
issues directly to the upstream developers of this software. |
| 29 |
Homepage:http://clucene.sourceforge.net/ |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
I'm assuming everyone gets this warning, so am wondering what it means, |
| 32 |
and whether or not I should even bother with clucene. Lucene++ appears |
| 33 |
to possibly be the new lucene implementation, but it is <yuck> java based... |
Archives