Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Raymond Lewis Rebbeck <dystopianray@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] What about kernel 2.6.19 ?
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 20:05:48
Message-Id: 200702180629.07227.dystopianray@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] What about kernel 2.6.19 ? by John covici
1 On Sunday, 18 February 2007 6:19, John covici wrote:
2 > on Sunday 02/18/2007 Raymond Lewis Rebbeck(dystopianray@×××××.com) wrote
3 >
4 > > On Sunday, 18 February 2007 5:41, Dan Farrell wrote:
5 > > > On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 05:31:21 +1030
6 > > >
7 > > > Raymond Lewis Rebbeck <dystopianray@×××××.com> wrote:
8 > > > > On Sunday, 18 February 2007 5:25, alain.didierjean@××××.fr wrote:
9 > > > > > Just compiled kernel 2.6.19-r5, with same config as 2.6.18-r6.
10 > > > > > When trying to boot it, I get a kernel panic, grub not finding
11 > > > > > (hd0,0), when booting 2.6.18 doesn't cause any problem. What's new
12 > > > > > in 2.6.19 that causes this? What's the solution ? Help welcome.
13 > > > > >
14 > > > > > --
15 > > > > > ~adj~
16 > > > >
17 > > > > It's probably due to the SATA drivers being moved out of the SCSI
18 > > > > section of menuconfig, which iirc, changed their CONFIG names.
19 > > > >
20 > > > > You should double check that all your required drivers have been
21 > > > > configured.
22 > > >
23 > > > I tried kernel 2.19 and the new libata PATA drivers and all seemed to
24 > > > work fine, execpt I too got the same kernel panic with not
25 > > > finding /dev/hd[a-z][0-9]+. I think the names of these device nodes
26 > > > might have changed? I'm not sure but my theory is that if i would
27 > > > have used the older ATA drivers instead, things would have been fine.
28 > > >
29 > > > People _Are_ running the 2.6.19 kernels successfully.
30 > >
31 > > The new libata PATA drivers put your hdds under /dev/sd* and your cdroms
32 > > under /dev/sr* rather than /dev/hd*. So you'll have to either
33 > > reconfigure your kernel to use the regular IDE drivers or fix all
34 > > mention of /dev/hd* to the correct /dev/sd* device.
35 >
36 > Well, if I do that will I have to have only 15 partitions on an ide
37 > drive -- currently I am running on a drive with 17 partitions? Which
38 > configs are the old ide drivers and are they going to be maintained?
39
40 I've never heard of any 15 partition limit. The old ide drivers are the
41 CONFIG_IDE drivers that you'd have been using previously. They are likely to
42 be maintained for the forseeable future. The libata PATA drivers are
43 considered experimental and do not yet implement all the functionality and
44 device support of the existing ide drivers.
45
46 --
47 Raymond Lewis Rebbeck
48 --
49 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] What about kernel 2.6.19 ? Raymond Lewis Rebbeck <dystopianray@×××××.com>