Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Ian K <omega_2_1@×××××.ca>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] F4L
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 20:04:01
Message-Id: 4301F0E1.6030406@yahoo.ca
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] F4L by Nick Rout
1 Nick Rout wrote:
2
3 >On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 11:53 +0200, Frank Schafer wrote:
4 >
5 >
6 >>On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 21:46 +1200, Nick Rout wrote:
7 >>
8 >>
9 >>>On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 11:25 +0200, Christoph Gysin wrote:
10 >>>
11 >>>
12 >>>>Nick Rout wrote:
13 >>>>
14 >>>>
15 >>>>>try the ebuild that is on bugs.gentoo.org
16 >>>>>
17 >>>>>
18 >>>>Be nice and provide a link:
19 >>>>http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82154
20 >>>>
21 >>>>
22 >>>Ahh yeah i had closed the bug window by the time I posted, and thought
23 >>>Ian is just as capable of finding it as I am.
24 >>>
25 >>>Although it compiles cleanly, it does not seem to do much. No
26 >>>documentation - in fact it installs only two files, an executable and
27 >>>a .desktop file.
28 >>>
29 >>>I have no experience with flash generation tools. This has a gui in
30 >>>which it is easy to see what they are trying to do, and millions of menu
31 >>>options, its just that many of them don't seem to actually do anything.
32 >>>
33 >>>A tutorial would be nice.
34 >>>
35 >>>
36 >>Hmmm, wouldn't be this a task for the F4L developers?
37 >>
38 >>
39 >
40 >I wasn't saying otherwise, I was commenting on the package, not the
41 >gentoo implementation.
42 >
43 >
44 >
45 >>>Still at 0.2 I wasn't expecting the world.
46 >>>
47 >>>
48 Nor am I, I was just wanting to see how far along they are, basically.
49 It looks like a very promising project.
50 Ian
51
52 PS>> Thanks for the ebuilds/links/you know what I mean.
53
54 >>>
55 >>>
56 >>>>Christoph
57 >>>>
58 >>>>
59 >>>--
60 >>>Nick Rout <nick@×××××××.nz>
61 >>>
62 >>>
63 >>>

Attachments

File name MIME type
omega_2_1.vcf text/x-vcard

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] F4L Tero Grundstrm <tero@××××××××××××.fi>