1 |
On Sunday 18 Aug 2013 20:37:19 Tanstaafl wrote: |
2 |
> On 2013-08-18 4:40 AM, Alessio Ababilov <ilovegnulinux@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> > Sure, /lib is affected. This was the idea of FreeDesktop.org's article |
4 |
> > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/TheCaseForTheUsrMerge/, |
5 |
> > and so does my script. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> And so the /usr merge is part and parcel of systemd. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I'm not afraid that the gentoo council is drinking the kool-aid, it is |
10 |
> as obvious as the nose on my face that they *are*, and as has been said, |
11 |
> unless someone or more people return some sanity to the project, gentoo |
12 |
> will be systemd only sooner rather than later. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Guess I need to start looking at FreeBSD too... :( |
15 |
|
16 |
Having left Slackware for Gentoo more than 10 years ago this is going to feel |
17 |
like a regressive step for me, but if it comes to it I guess I will have to |
18 |
consider it. |
19 |
|
20 |
I honestly cannot understand why we/Gentoo are allowing the RHL monolithic |
21 |
development philosophy to break what we have. Is Poettering the only |
22 |
developer available to the Linux world? Are RHL dictating what path Debian |
23 |
and its cousin distros should follow? |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Regards, |
27 |
Mick |