| 1 |
Walter Dnes wrote: |
| 2 |
> I can make mistakes, and this looks like one. My corrected |
| 3 |
> interpretation is that accepting *ALL* ~X86 is a problem. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Not a problem per say, but it will make you use packages that are |
| 6 |
flagged for ebuild testing (the package *should* be stable but the |
| 7 |
ebuild might not be). Hence you might run into some nasty bugs but they |
| 8 |
should be quite unfrequent. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> If someone |
| 11 |
> needs a couple of ~X86 packages, package.unmask is the way to go. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Or rather package.keywords. package.unmask is for using packages that |
| 15 |
are masked in package.mask. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Naga |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives