1 |
Hi Stephan, |
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
Frankly, I don't think it would bring anything to you, except maybe |
5 |
the possibility to cancel a suspension on the fly and maybe some check |
6 |
when coming from suspension. |
7 |
|
8 |
I'm using tuxonice only for the suspend to disk, but even there, the |
9 |
kernel has some builtin features that would be sufficient for me (I'm |
10 |
lazy, I don't want to try ;-)). |
11 |
|
12 |
tuxonice is mainly some wrapping scripts that makes the suspension |
13 |
more feature full than the bare kernel provided but in the end, they |
14 |
still use what the kernel provides. |
15 |
|
16 |
In your case, I don't think it's mandatory to use tuxonice. |
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
HTH, |
20 |
|
21 |
Greg |
22 |
|
23 |
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger <lists@×××××.at> wrote: |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Greets, |
26 |
> |
27 |
> I use suspend-to-ram all the time on my desktop-machine as well. |
28 |
> Energy-saving and quicker for me ... it works fine. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> I use the tuxonice-sources for this, back then it was more reliable with |
31 |
> my hardware. Usually the ebuild for tuxonice-sources is some weeks later |
32 |
> than gentoo-sources. As I am always curious for the latest stable kernel |
33 |
> I often run gentoo-sources inbetween (and think to myself "I can get by |
34 |
> without S2R for a while"). |
35 |
> |
36 |
> Now I have noticed that "hibernate-ram" works with plain gentoo-sources |
37 |
> as well. And it does so without a problem. Fine! |
38 |
> |
39 |
> Is there any real advantage in using tuxonice here? Pls note that I only |
40 |
> use S2R, and never suspend to disk .... all the disk-related features of |
41 |
> tuxonice aren't important to me. |
42 |
> |
43 |
> Thanks for your opinions, Stefan |
44 |
> |
45 |
> |