| 1 |
On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 16:16:41 -0400, |
| 2 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> [1 <text/plain; US-ASCII (quoted-printable)>] |
| 5 |
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 11:07:38 -0400, John Covici wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > > think it was removed for a similar reason: |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/791004 |
| 10 |
> > > |
| 11 |
> > It was mrxvt. But why would the announcement list specify valid |
| 12 |
> > versions for those packages, if they have been removed? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> It specifies the affected versions that were in the tree, probably |
| 15 |
> because those are what people may have installed. It also states " |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Resolution |
| 18 |
> ========== |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Gentoo has discontinued support for Mrxvt. We recommend that users |
| 21 |
> remove it: |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> # emerge --ask --depclean "x11-terms/mrxvt" |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> with similar recommendations for the other packages you mention, except |
| 26 |
> for oracle-jdk where it recommends alternatives. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
OK, I usually don't read past the effected packages part, so I didn't |
| 29 |
see those recomendations -- thanks. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: |
| 33 |
How do |
| 34 |
you spend it? |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
John Covici wb2una |
| 37 |
covici@××××××××××.com |
Archives