| 1 |
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 05:28:14PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am 06.06.2011 17:18, schrieb Indi: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > Maybe we should also both remember that I *am* running ~x86? |
| 5 |
> > :) |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> That should make now difference, my girlfriend uses ~x86 on her laptop |
| 8 |
> and there thunderbird reads and applies the userChrome.css just like |
| 9 |
> here with my ~amd64 thunderbird. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> The programmcode for 32bit and 64bit thunderbird is for all parts that |
| 12 |
> has to do with chrome-rendering absolut the same. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
BTW, the testing I did was with version 3.1.10, and with portage |
| 16 |
building it, rather than using thunderbird-bin. The version of |
| 17 |
xulrunner is 2.0.1-r1i, which seems to be working just fine with |
| 18 |
both firefox and conkeror (no, I don't mean "konqueror"). |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Just in case anyone's keeping score and needs the info. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
klaatu virada nicto |
Archives