| 1 |
On Saturday 27 March 2010 00:57:31 Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:39:51 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Redhat always was gnome shop for no good reasons at all. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Wasn't it because of the not-very-free licensing of QT at the time? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
No, that was the FSF's beef. As Volker said, Red Hat have never had a problem |
| 8 |
with proprietary bits. Personally I think they are just being pragmatic. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
RH probably chose Gnome as it is easier to ship a fully working out-the-box |
| 11 |
system with gnome. KDE has too many knobs |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives