1 |
On 7/7/06, Richard Fish <bigfish@××××××××××.org> wrote: |
2 |
> On 7/7/06, Lord Sauron <lordsauronthegreat@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> > Scripts are great, but they aren't for whole applications. Yes, that |
4 |
> > would be a quotable. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> I think (someone please correct me if I am wrong) that most of portage |
7 |
> is actually implemented in python. The actual merge process is shell |
8 |
> script, but things like dependency resolution and so forth should be |
9 |
> all python. |
10 |
|
11 |
I don't speak much python. |
12 |
|
13 |
> And python is actually pretty quick. Not nearly as fast as C, but |
14 |
> easily fast enough for this kind of work. I think you would find the |
15 |
> biggest gains would be from using more efficient algorithms and data |
16 |
> storage, rather than re-implementing parts in another language. |
17 |
|
18 |
Yeah, you're most likely right. |
19 |
|
20 |
> -Richard |
21 |
> -- |
22 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
23 |
> |
24 |
> |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
========== GCv3.12 ========== |
29 |
GCS d-(++) s+: a? C++ UL+>++++ P+ |
30 |
L++ E--- W+(+++) N++ o? K? w--- O? M+ |
31 |
V? PS- PE+ Y-(--) PGP- t+++ 5? X R tv-- b+ |
32 |
DI+++ D+ G e* h- !r !y |
33 |
========= END GCv3.12 ======== |
34 |
-- |
35 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |