| 1 |
On 10/23/2010 5:03 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 02:50:26 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>> You're mixing two different definitions of stable. Portage 2.2 is |
| 5 |
>>> certainly reliable, but it is anything but stable with a new version |
| 6 |
>>> coming out every day at the moment,. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>> I'm waiting for tomorrow when my regularly scheduled portage update |
| 9 |
>> hits _rc100. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Well, it hasn't happened yet. A day without a portage update, a rare |
| 12 |
> thing these days. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Maybe someone decided that Gentoo is not Debian and 99 release candidates |
| 15 |
> should be enough for a bunch of python scripts. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Looks like someone agrees with you: |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
[ebuild U ] sys-apps/portage-2.2.0_alpha1 [2.2_rc91] |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Although, perhaps I'm missing something but doesn't alpha |
| 22 |
come *before* release candidate? :) |
Archives