| 1 |
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 23:48:38 Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:31:24 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I can't argue with that. I just get a little paranoid about auth logs |
| 4 |
> > being sent (with credentials) over partially-open networks, hence the |
| 5 |
> > attraction of encrypted traffic |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> What about using an SSH tunnel? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I thought about that - people other than me set up most of the machines and |
| 10 |
this may or may not be easy for them to do in practice. I'm sure you've seen |
| 11 |
how easy it is for otherwise smart people to royally screw up anything with |
| 12 |
ssh in it's name... |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Just keeping my options open, maybe there's something better suited to what I |
| 15 |
need than vanilla syslog-ng |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives