1 |
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 06:52:23PM -0500, Penguin Lover Dale squawked: |
2 |
> Questions: You knew I subscribed to this list. lol I ran the command: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> find -H /usr/lib /lib -type f | xargs qfile -o |
5 |
> |
6 |
> and I got a lot of hits. I'm just going to post snippets of the |
7 |
> directories here. It is a LONG list otherwise. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> /usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/ |
10 |
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i486-linux/sys/ |
11 |
> /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/dbus/ |
12 |
> /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Numeric/ |
13 |
> /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PyQt4/uic/ |
14 |
> /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Pyrex/Plex/ |
15 |
> /usr/lib/portage/pym/ |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Some of those directories have additional directories in them but I |
18 |
> tried to hit the highlights. Now to my questions. Can these be |
19 |
> deleted? Should one make certain these doesn't belong to some package |
20 |
> somewhere? Should I update my backups BEFORE deleting these? o_O |
21 |
|
22 |
Depends if you do have those packages installed. Numeric is from |
23 |
dev-python/numeric, for example. |
24 |
|
25 |
Also, be careful when you parse the output of the command. Most of the |
26 |
.pyc and .pyo files in the python2.5 directories are byte-compiled |
27 |
version that python generated dynamically the first time they are |
28 |
used. For example: ..../Numeric/numeric_version.py was installed by |
29 |
the ebuild and thuse qfile tells me it belongs to dev-python/numeric, |
30 |
but .../Numeric/numeric_version.pyc is listed as an "orphan". While it |
31 |
is safe to delete, it will just be regenerated again later, wasting |
32 |
computing cycles. |
33 |
|
34 |
Ditto for some of the files in the perl directory. |
35 |
|
36 |
W |
37 |
-- |
38 |
I am not a physics major. I am not a physics major. I will never be a physics |
39 |
major. I never will want to be a physics major. I can never be a physics |
40 |
major. ~Daniel Jonathan Peng |
41 |
Sortir en Pantoufles: up 913 days, 22:59 |