| 1 |
On 13.03.2012 09:15, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: |
| 2 |
> If I'm understanding you, you want: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> fstab: |
| 5 |
> /dev/XX /mnt/p1 ... |
| 6 |
> /dev/YY /mnt/p2 ... |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> and then |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> /usr/portage -> /mnt/p1 |
| 11 |
> /usr/src -> /mnt/p2 |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> (or using bindmounting, whatever). |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> This makes no sense at all (at least not to me), when you can simply: |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> fstab: |
| 18 |
> /dev/XX /usr/portage ... |
| 19 |
> /dev/YY /usr/src ... |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> and get the same split filesystem, but without all the complication |
| 22 |
> you are proposing. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Unless there is something I don't understand, in which case I'm not |
| 25 |
> following your reasoning. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
There are 2 possible things one can do: |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
1) Split everything, /usr, /usr/src, /usr/portage each on a seperate |
| 30 |
filesystem. |
| 31 |
2) Seperate multiple paths from /usr: Have 1 fs /mnt/data and link (or |
| 32 |
bind mount) /usr/src, /usr/portage there. You have a shared fs for dirx, |
| 33 |
that are usually not shared. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
What would be the benefits of symlinks and bind mounts for doing 2)? |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Philipp |
Archives