| 1 |
On 3/10/20 8:20 PM, Michael wrote: |
| 2 |
> What-ever I may buy in the future, I'll make sure it does not contain Intel |
| 3 |
> inside ... |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/03/10/lvi_intel_cpu_attack/ |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> YMMV. :-) |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Yep. |
| 10 |
Many of us have been on pure AMD, for a long time. I'm very glad to see |
| 11 |
those abused by Intel/nvidia joining the older and damaged gentoo hacks..... |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
PS, a myriad of (embedded) arm* systems (single or in a loose cluster) |
| 15 |
could also be part of a secured, (easy?) straight-forward pathway to |
| 16 |
secured, gentoo? Either a single system, or a 'small-net' (2-dns |
| 17 |
servers, 1-mail server, one web-server and 1 secure, hidden workstation). |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Perhaps some of the really smart or elites at gentoo would propose a |
| 20 |
list of tools/codes/strategies that in essence yields an integrated and |
| 21 |
consistent solution for the single (redundant) system, or the 'small |
| 22 |
net' with in essences a packaged service like this:: |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
https://threatconnect.com/ |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
or other similar semantics (~commercial offerings) that many of us |
| 29 |
simply cannot afford? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Just a list of packages would be a great start, combined with a security |
| 33 |
optimize, minimized gentoo-compatible kernel....? |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
PS, Kali-linux or Pentoo is close to the 'single-system' (?) but what |
| 36 |
about the 'small-net' itemized list? |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
curiously, |
| 40 |
James |
Archives