| 1 |
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 07:19:40PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Not every tool is for every user or every need. |
| 4 |
> If there a better tool to use then why bother with something less. |
| 5 |
> I'm not a thunderbird fanboy so i can accept that t-bird has its |
| 6 |
> limitations and its problems and that it is not for everyone. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Thank you for understanding. |
| 10 |
I don't get the thing of people having a personal stake in what others |
| 11 |
choose, but it does seem to be pretty common. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I appreciate the people who tried to help, and I understand those who |
| 14 |
cried "PEBKAC" too. But once it's clear I've followed the same |
| 15 |
directions the same way as others and didn't get the same result, it's |
| 16 |
time to ask "is this really important enough to pursue further?". |
| 17 |
Sometimes the answer is "no". |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
In this case, claws-mail looks *much* easier to support. |
| 20 |
Certainly I see the appeal of tbird though, it's responsive and in every |
| 21 |
way other than the font sizes (and maybe the addressbook, though I |
| 22 |
didn't go as deeply into that) it's a pretty impressive piece of work. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I just want to deploy something more idiot-proof. |
| 25 |
And those of you who obviously think *I'm* an idiot, you should |
| 26 |
meet some of my users! Make me look like the Stephen Hawking of |
| 27 |
sysadmins... |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
klaatu virada nicto |
Archives