| 1 |
On Friday 23 January 2009 12:06:43 Damian wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
| 3 |
wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On Friday 23 January 2009 11:11:18 Damian wrote: |
| 5 |
> >> Hello, |
| 6 |
> >> |
| 7 |
> >> What does it means when the ~amd64 is not one of the keywords used to |
| 8 |
> >> mask the package? |
| 9 |
> >> |
| 10 |
> >> The problem I have is that I would like to install amarok 2 but I |
| 11 |
> >> cannot unmask it by accepting ~amd64. It is safe to unmask it using |
| 12 |
> >> ~x86 even though my system is amd64? |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > The ebuild has this: |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > $ grep KEYWORDS amarok-2.0.1.1.ebuild |
| 17 |
> > KEYWORDS="~x86" |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > So it's not even tested on amd64. The answer is in 'man portage': |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Thanks Alan. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I almost forgot - trying to emerge amarok2.0.1.1 is almost guaranteed to fail |
| 24 |
due to the amarok devs have no clue as to how mysql is built, plus other |
| 25 |
errors: |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=238487 |
| 28 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=250870 |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives