| 1 |
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 21:36:42 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Am 07.01.2015 um 21:17 schrieb Neil Bothwick: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > That's not what I meant, but I see your point about using --reflink |
| 6 |
> > if making copies. My thought was to forget the whole tmpfs and |
| 7 |
> > copying think, set KEEP WORK in FEATURES and use XFS for |
| 8 |
> > PORTAGE_TMPDIR. That way most of the work is taking place in the |
| 9 |
> > cache without the frequent disk writes of other filesystems. I |
| 10 |
> > would expect XFS to be faster for this job, but have no data to |
| 11 |
> > support that assumption. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Maybe I am not fully up to date with this thread. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> You mean, PORTAGE_TMPDIR on xfs (on disk ... hdd or ssd) might be |
| 16 |
> faster than on tmpfs? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Interesting ... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
No/ I mean TMPDIR on XFS might be faster, and a lot less complex, than |
| 21 |
TMPDIR on tmpfs and copying everything to hard disk too. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
If the funeral procession is at night, do folks drive with their lights |
| 28 |
off? |
Archives