| 1 |
On 09/12/2017 03:07 PM, Heiko Baums wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am Tue, 12 Sep 2017 17:28:40 -0400 |
| 3 |
> schrieb Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> I would advise against this INSTALL_MASK setting. It is quite likely |
| 6 |
>> to break things (like sys-fs/udev). |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> No, it's not. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I'd consider it a bug if systemd is not installed and |
| 11 |
> another package that doesn't depend on systemd relies on something that |
| 12 |
> is installed in a systemd subdirectory. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> And for me nothing was broken since several years now. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> And, like I said, I'm using eudev instead of udev. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Heiko |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
You may be using eudev (and thus don't need to worry about it), but if a |
| 21 |
person blindly copies that into their make.conf and sys-fs/udev breaks, |
| 22 |
they'll get to keep the pieces because they deliberately screwed |
| 23 |
themselves. It's not a use case we can support. It doesn't mean |
| 24 |
INSTALL_MASK is always a bad idea; it's simply meant to be used by |
| 25 |
people who are fully aware of its effects. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer, Trustee, Treasurer |
| 29 |
OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net |
| 30 |
fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6 |
Archives