Archives
Archives
| From: | Harry Putnam <reader@×××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: Is Vesa/Uvesa still the way for Frame buffer | ||
| Date: | Fri, 02 Aug 2013 16:01:00 | ||
| Message-Id: | 87y58kultz.fsf@newsguy.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Is Vesa/Uvesa still the way for Frame buffer by Harry Putnam |
||
| 1 | Harry Putnam <reader@×××××××.com> writes: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > It could be typified by the kernel line used in grub.conf like this |
| 4 | > one: |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > kernel /vmlinuz root=/dev/sdb3 vga=0x31A video=vesafb:mtrr,ywrap |
| 7 | |
| 8 | I should have included this information: |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Kernel is v. 3.8.13, and it is a gentoo install as guest on a windows7 |
| 11 | 64bit, using vbox=4.2.16 r86992 |