Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Building, daq, failed
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 15:24:04
Message-Id: 5415B2C2.1000700@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Building, daq, failed by meino.cramer@gmx.de
1 On 14/09/2014 10:29, meino.cramer@×××.de wrote:
2 > Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> [14-09-14 10:12]:
3 >> On 14/09/2014 09:10, meino.cramer@×××.de wrote:
4 >
5 > ---->8 snip ------------>8---------------------
6 >
7 >>> | int
8 >>> | main ()
9 >>> | {
10 >>> |
11 >>> | ;
12 >>> | return 0;
13 >>> | }
14 >>> configure:3444: error: in `/var/tmp/portage/net-libs/daq-2.0.2/work/daq-2.0.2':
15 >>> configure:3446: error: C compiler cannot create executables
16 >>> See `config.log' for more details
17 >>>
18 >>> To check I reemerged 'less' and this compiles fine. So, gcc works fine
19 >>> so far.
20 >>>
21 >>> What's wrong here? Wrong gcc-version? daq not compatible with gcc (or
22 >>> vice versa)?
23 >>
24 >>
25 >> I think it's wrong gcc-version because of these silly errors:
26 >>
27 >> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-V'
28 >> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-qversion'
29 >> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-combine'
30 >>
31 >> I haven't looked into it any further, but I'd say it's a bug in the
32 >> build system so report it to bgo.
33 >>
34 >> Meanwhile, as a workaround to get it to build, install gcc:4.7 and use
35 >> that to build daq. See if that works, if so mention it in your bug report.
36 >>
37 >
38 > Hi Alan,
39 >
40 > thanks for replying ! :)
41 >
42 > daq compiles fine with gcc-4.7. .
43 > Bug tracker:
44 > I tried this before (another kind of "something-not-working-as-expected").
45 > The bug tracker does not like me...
46 > I tried to log in...no.
47 > I reset my password...tried to log in...no.
48 > Cookies were "on" on my side.
49 > Sorr...
50
51
52 That is itself a bug and you should log a ticket on bgo for it.
53
54 Oh, wait :-)
55
56 With luck there will be a "contact admin" link at bgo where you can ask
57 someone to look into that issue for you. Or ask on irc and find one of
58 the infra/admin people to assist you
59
60
61
62 --
63 Alan McKinnon
64 alan.mckinnon@×××××.com