| 1 |
econti wrote: |
| 2 |
> Tim Jones ha scritto: |
| 3 |
>> Post #2 from Mr. McKinnon is the question. |
| 4 |
>> If, as it sounds like, you didn't let revdep-rebuild go ahead and |
| 5 |
>> reemerge those packages itself, but rather you reemerged them |
| 6 |
>> yourself, then I believe you will need to `revdep-rebuild -i` (see |
| 7 |
>> manpage) to see if it has any other complaints. And there's nothing |
| 8 |
>> unusual about broken dependencies after library upgrades... just let |
| 9 |
>> revdep-rebuild rebuild the necessary packages for you, that's why it's |
| 10 |
>> there |
| 11 |
> The problem is that revdep-rebuild fails in rebuilding them. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> enilio |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
If it fails during the compile, post the error. Post about the last few |
| 19 |
dozen lines at least. Most of the time, the error is farther up than it |
| 20 |
may seem. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Dale |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
:-) :-) |
Archives