1 |
Ahahahah... |
2 |
Il giorno 05/lug/2013 22:13, "Dale" <rdalek1967@×××××.com> ha scritto: |
3 |
|
4 |
> |
5 |
> I had a interesting adventure the other day. A friend of mine's son is |
6 |
> getting ready to go to college. Budget is tight so we went to find a |
7 |
> used laptop for him. I went into the local puter shop and the techie |
8 |
> guy there had a interesting statement that makes me think I'm not |
9 |
> recommending them for computer service to anyone else. While we was |
10 |
> chatting, he said that Linux is just as prone to getting a virus as |
11 |
> windoze and so is a Mac. I think my laughing let him know I wasn't |
12 |
> buying his comment. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> I since did some googling and it seems I am right and he just thought I |
15 |
> was some know nothing guy he could sell some service too. Anyway, has |
16 |
> anything changed to make Linux more prone to viruses than it used to |
17 |
> be? I read a percentage somewhere that said like 99% of viruses are |
18 |
> windoze only. Is there a indisputable source of information on this? |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Thanks. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Dale |
23 |
> |
24 |
> :-) :-) |
25 |
> |
26 |
> -- |
27 |
> I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or |
28 |
> how you interpreted my words! |
29 |
> |
30 |
> |
31 |
> |