Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] What's broken with portage now?
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 17:06:48
Message-Id: 5bdc1c8b0604231001r4ffa4088w4a4da374460357ea@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] What's broken with portage now? by Mick
1 I run eix-sync instead. I just ran it with no problems here.
2
3 Hope this helps,
4 Mark
5
6 On 4/23/06, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote:
7 > As it tries to update its cache after an emerge --sync it comes up
8 > with a load of errors like so:
9 > ======================
10 > Literal data: 5903578 bytes
11 > Matched data: 0 bytes
12 > File list size: 3297486
13 > Total bytes written: 36921
14 > Total bytes read: 5388275
15 >
16 > wrote 36921 bytes read 5388275 bytes 37544.61 bytes/sec
17 > total size is 126887824 speedup is 23.39
18 >
19 > >>> Updating Portage cache:
20 > Failed cache update: app-accessibility/at-poke-0.2.2 "Corruption
21 > detected when reading key 'at-poke-0.2.2': dictionary update sequence
22 > element #0 has length 1; 2 is required"
23 >
24 > Failed cache update: app-accessibility/dasher-3.2.18 "Corruption
25 > detected when reading key 'dasher-3.2.18': dictionary update sequence
26 > element #0 has length 1; 2 is required"
27 > ======================
28 > . . . and so on until the end of the packages.
29 >
30 > I resynced twice, same error. Anyone else had it?
31 > --
32 > Regards,
33 > Mick
34 >
35 > --
36 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
37 >
38 >
39
40 --
41 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] What's broken with portage now? Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>