| 1 |
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 04:55:01PM -0500, Dale wrote |
| 2 |
> Hi folks, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I was curious, what's the results of the openrc update for people that |
| 5 |
> have done theirs? Is it pretty simple and "just works" or are there |
| 6 |
> issues? I'm mostly interested in x86 and amd64 since that is what I |
| 7 |
> have. Just a simple works here and I'm X86 or amd64 would be nice. |
| 8 |
> List issues if you had any. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I had one syntax error that totally broke networking on my amd64 |
| 11 |
stable.. Fortunately, I hadn't upgrade my hot backup machine <G>. I |
| 12 |
had simply removed the bash parentheses in /etc/conf.d/net and got... |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
config_eth0= |
| 15 |
"192.168.123.249/29 broadcast 192.168.123.255 mtu 1454 |
| 16 |
169.254.1.3/16 broadcast 169.254.255.255" |
| 17 |
routes_eth0= |
| 18 |
"default via 192.168.123.254 metric 2 |
| 19 |
192.168.123.248/29 via 192.168.123.254 metric 0 |
| 20 |
169.254.0.0/16 via 169.254.1.3 metric 0" |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
The result was "no network for you". Moving the opening quote to |
| 23 |
immediately after the equals sign (for both config_eth0 and routes_eth0) |
| 24 |
fixed that, like so... |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
config_eth0=" |
| 27 |
192.168.123.249/29 broadcast 192.168.123.255 mtu 1454 |
| 28 |
169.254.1.3/16 broadcast 169.254.255.255" |
| 29 |
routes_eth0=" |
| 30 |
default via 192.168.123.254 metric 2 |
| 31 |
192.168.123.248/29 via 192.168.123.254 metric 0 |
| 32 |
169.254.0.0/16 via 169.254.1.3 metric 0" |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
A big thank you to William Hubbs for spotting that error. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |
Archives