Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [SOLVED] Re: [gentoo-user] Just a heads-up, I think =sys-libs/glibc-2.14.1-r3 is a stinker.
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:47:31
Message-Id: CA+czFiDhS-uoCNRQ_YKmXB662rSJ1H8Uewy0pq62Au_o-we4ww@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [SOLVED] Re: [gentoo-user] Just a heads-up, I think =sys-libs/glibc-2.14.1-r3 is a stinker. by Neil Bothwick
1 On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote:
2 > On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:58:57 -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
3 >
4 >> If you build glibc with CFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -g3", your glibc will be
5 >> very, very broken. Apparently, it's old, known and has been a problem
6 >> for about five years.[1]
7 >
8 > Thisd sounds worthy of a bug report, an ebuild allowing you to break
9 > something as critical as glibc without even a warning does not sound good.
10
11 Take a look at my bugreport: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423149
12
13 And then follow through to the bug report it was marked as a duplicate
14 of. Gentoo devs, at least, know of the problem, but don't want to put
15 a workaround in the ebuild for it.
16
17 Also, even if the ebuild issued a warning, there's no guarantee the
18 warning would ever be made visible; the system is well and truly hosed
19 before the 'postinst' stage of the install, so who knows whether or
20 not the cache-and-show-later warnings would reach the user?
21
22 --
23 :wq

Replies