1 |
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:58:57 -0400, Michael Mol wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> If you build glibc with CFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -g3", your glibc will be |
5 |
>> very, very broken. Apparently, it's old, known and has been a problem |
6 |
>> for about five years.[1] |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Thisd sounds worthy of a bug report, an ebuild allowing you to break |
9 |
> something as critical as glibc without even a warning does not sound good. |
10 |
|
11 |
Take a look at my bugreport: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423149 |
12 |
|
13 |
And then follow through to the bug report it was marked as a duplicate |
14 |
of. Gentoo devs, at least, know of the problem, but don't want to put |
15 |
a workaround in the ebuild for it. |
16 |
|
17 |
Also, even if the ebuild issued a warning, there's no guarantee the |
18 |
warning would ever be made visible; the system is well and truly hosed |
19 |
before the 'postinst' stage of the install, so who knows whether or |
20 |
not the cache-and-show-later warnings would reach the user? |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
:wq |