1 |
R0b0t1 <r030t1@×××××.com> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Jun 9, 2016 4:25 PM, "lee" <lee@××××××××.de> wrote: |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> R0b0t1 <r030t1@×××××.com> writes: |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> > Use Bumblebee. It is the FOSS version of Optimus. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> That seems to be for laptops having peculiar hardware. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Nope. Works regardless. |
13 |
|
14 |
If that works with two NVIDIA cards, the PCI bus might not be fast |
15 |
enough. Even if it's fast enough, I have no idea how it would perform, |
16 |
considering that it's possible (even likely) that not both PCI slots for |
17 |
the graphics cards are connected to the same CPU --- however they do |
18 |
that on boards that have two, it might not be an issue at all or perform |
19 |
much worse than using a single card. |
20 |
|
21 |
Do you have such a setup in use? |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
And the docs say: |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
"WARNING:You must install the Nvidia binaries in a way that will not |
28 |
break Mesa’s LibGL, it is needed for 3D acceleration on the Intel |
29 |
card. This means that on most distros you will need a Bumblebee specific |
30 |
package for it to run, the stock packages on most cases will break |
31 |
LibGL."[1] |
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
I do not have an Intel card. And what are these Optimus cards they |
35 |
mention? |
36 |
|
37 |
Besides, IIUC this is intended for /switching between/ different |
38 |
cards. I do not want to switch between cards but /use both of them at |
39 |
the same time/. There's no point in switching between them, and |
40 |
apparently that would be more a disadvantage than anything else due to |
41 |
the overhead involved. |
42 |
|
43 |
|
44 |
[1]: https://github.com/Bumblebee-Project/Bumblebee/wiki/Supported-drivers |