| 1 |
On 7/31/06, Alexander Skwar <listen@×××××××××××××××.name> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Michael Crute wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On 7/31/06, Alexander Skwar <listen@×××××××××××××××.name> wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> Suranga Kasthuriarachchi wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> >> > Which is the best for organization mail server. |
| 7 |
> >> |
| 8 |
> >> NOT qmail - too many holes and not good performancewise. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> > I would beg to differ with the statement about security. Qmail is |
| 11 |
> > arguably THE MOST secure mail server |
| 12 |
> > (http://cr.yp.to/qmail/guarantee.html). |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Actually, it is NOT. DJB made this statement but he doesn't |
| 15 |
> stand to it. See http://home.pages.de/~mandree/qmail-bugs.html |
| 16 |
> for a quite big collection of bugs and RFC violations of qmail. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> To quote from that page: |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I'm not here to start a war over the merits of any one MTA... but I |
| 22 |
think it's worth reading DJBs rebuttal of the accusations made by |
| 23 |
Postfix's author. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
http://cr.yp.to/qmail/venema.html |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
________________________________ |
| 29 |
Michael E. Crute |
| 30 |
http://mike.crute.org |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended |
| 33 |
up where I intended to be. --Douglas Adams |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives