Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: zsh: not so bad?
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 05:43:10
Message-Id: mo27gs$2ha$1@ger.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] zsh: not so bad? by Alon Bar-Lev
1 Alon Bar-Lev <alonbl@g.o> wrote:
2 >
3 > Only issue I could not find a solution to is tab completion after '=',
4 > for example:
5 >
6 > xxx --file=<TAB>
7 >
8 > This will not complete files, while it will be nice if it does.
9
10 For standard commands, it works as it should. For instance,
11
12 tar --file=<TAB>
13 chmod --reference=<TAB>
14 dd if=<TAB>
15
16 all work as excpected. For your own custom-commands, it is usually the
17 best idea to write your own _custom-command completion file for _zsh
18 where you can specify the options and their arguments (and how the
19 option arguments can look like, e.g. whether "=" is acceptable
20 as an option-argument separator) in detail.
21
22 For instance, gentoo-zsh-completion does this for most commands of
23 gentoo projects, others like eix bring their own completion files.
24 If you don't, you do not get completion for options but only the
25 "generic" completion of filenames (in which case "=" has no magic
26 meaning, of course).
27
28 > There is magic_equal_subst option which enables that but also cause
29 > harm when using = in other places such as:
30
31 That's exactly the purpose of magic_equal_subst:
32 To support it for *all* arguments everywhere.
33 Usually there is no point to specify this globally.
34 You can of course set it locally in a specific completion function,
35 in which you want it (although other completion helper functions
36 like _arguments are usually sufficient to treat "=" correctly).
37
38 > Is there any sequence to enable completion after space without
39 > effecting the entire interpreter?
40
41 After "space"? I suppose the question you meant is answered above.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: zsh: not so bad? Alon Bar-Lev <alonbl@g.o>