From: | Dale <dalek@××××××××××.net> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice 2.0 - compiling or binary | ||
Date: | Wed, 30 Nov 2005 08:21:38 | ||
Message-Id: | 438D5F93.2050101@exceedtech.net | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice 2.0 - compiling or binary by Uwe Klosa |
1 | Uwe Klosa wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > I have used both versions. The compiled version seems to be more |
4 | > stable on my system. |
5 | > |
6 | > Uwe |
7 | > |
8 | I always compile mine to. It is downloading it now. Why is it only |
9 | 32MBs this time? It was over 200MBs last time. |
10 | |
11 | Dale |
12 | :-) |
13 | |
14 | -- |
15 | To err is human, I'm most certainly human. |
16 | |
17 | |
18 | |
19 | -- |
20 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice 2.0 - compiling or binary | Uwe Klosa <uwe.klosa@×××××.se> |