1 |
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 17:37:47 Stroller wrote: |
2 |
> On 10 Feb 2010, at 11:14, J. Roeleveld wrote: |
3 |
> > On Wednesday 10 February 2010 02:28:59 Stroller wrote: |
4 |
> >> On 9 Feb 2010, at 19:37, J. Roeleveld wrote: |
5 |
> >>> ... |
6 |
> >>> Don't get me started on those ;) |
7 |
> >>> The reason I use Linux Software Raid is because: |
8 |
> >>> 1) I can't afford hardware raid adapters |
9 |
> >>> 2) It's generally faster then hardware fakeraid |
10 |
> >> |
11 |
> >> I'd rather have slow hardware RAID than fast software RAID. I'm not |
12 |
> >> being a snob, it just suits my purposes better. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > I don't consider that comment as "snobbish" as I actually agree. |
15 |
> > But as I am using 6 disks in the array, a hardware RAID card to |
16 |
> > handle that |
17 |
> > would have pushed me above budget. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> See, for example, eBay item 280459693053. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> LSI is also a popular brand amongst Linux enthusiasts. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> 3ware have been taken over by LSI and their support has deteriorated |
24 |
> over the last few months, but 3ware cards come with transferrable 3 |
25 |
> year warranty, expiry date identifiable by serial number, and you will |
26 |
> often find eBay cards are still in warranty. |
27 |
|
28 |
Yes, except that I tend to avoid eBay as much as possible for reasons that |
29 |
don't belong on this list. |
30 |
|
31 |
> > My mainboard has PCI, PCI-X and PCI-e (1x and 16x), which connector- |
32 |
> > type would |
33 |
> > be best suited? |
34 |
> |
35 |
> PCI-e, PCI-X, PCI in that order, I *think*. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> PCI-X is very good, IIRC, it may be fractionally faster than PCI-e, |
38 |
> but I get the impression it's going out of fashion a bit on |
39 |
> motherboards. |
40 |
> |
41 |
> PCI-e is very fast and is the most readily usable on new & future |
42 |
> motherboards. It is what one would choose if buying new (I'm not sure |
43 |
> if PCI-X cards are still available), and so it is the most expensive |
44 |
> on the secondhand market. |
45 |
|
46 |
I know at least one shop in NL that sells them (They're also online) |
47 |
|
48 |
> Some 3ware PCI-X cards (eg the 9500S at least) are usable in regular |
49 |
> PCI slots, obviously at the expense of speed. Not sure about other |
50 |
> brands. |
51 |
> |
52 |
> Avoid 3ware 7000 & 8000 series cards - they are now ancient, although |
53 |
> you can pick them up for £10. |
54 |
> |
55 |
> > Also, I believe a PCI-e 8x card would work in a PCI-e 16x slot, but |
56 |
> > does this |
57 |
> > work with all mainboards/cards? Or are some more picky about this? |
58 |
> |
59 |
> No idea, sorry. I would have thought so, but I don't use PCI-e here yet. |
60 |
|
61 |
It's what all the buzz says, but I've yet to have that confirmed. It's |
62 |
especially the size of the slots and the cards where my concerns come from. |
63 |
|
64 |
> >> I would be far less invested in hardware RAID if I could find regular |
65 |
> >> SATA controllers which boasted hot-swap. I've read reports of people |
66 |
> >> hot-swapping SATA drives "just fine" on their cheap controllers but |
67 |
> >> last time I checked there were no manufacturers who supported this as |
68 |
> >> a feature. |
69 |
> > |
70 |
> > The mainboard I use (ASUS M3N-WS) has a working hotswap support |
71 |
> > (Yes, I tested |
72 |
> > this) using hotswap drive bays. |
73 |
> > Take a disk out, Linux actually sees it being removed prior to |
74 |
> > writing to it |
75 |
> > and when I stick it back in, it gets a new device assigned. |
76 |
> |
77 |
> This is very interesting to know. |
78 |
> |
79 |
> This would be very useful here, even if just for auxiliary use - |
80 |
> swapping in a drive from another machine just to clone it, backup or |
81 |
> recover data, for instance. |
82 |
|
83 |
Yes, but just for cloning, wouldn't it be just as easy to power down the |
84 |
machine, plug in the drive and then power it back up? |
85 |
Or even stick it on a quick-change USB-case? :) |
86 |
|
87 |
> If I found an Atom-based board that did hotswap on its normal SATA |
88 |
> ports I would probably purchase one in a flash. |
89 |
> |
90 |
> > On a different machine, where I tried it, the whole machine locked |
91 |
> > up when I |
92 |
> > removed the disk (And SATA is supposed to be hotswappable by |
93 |
> > design...) |
94 |
> |
95 |
> This is what I would normally expect, at least from when I last |
96 |
> checked a year or two ago. |
97 |
|
98 |
I do have to say here that the mainboard for that machine is now easily 5 |
99 |
years old, so I didn't actually expect it to work. |
100 |
|
101 |
> AIUI SATA by design *may* be hotswappable at the *option* of the |
102 |
> manufacturer. |
103 |
> (Please correct me if I am mistaken) |
104 |
|
105 |
I think it depends on if the controller actually sends the correct signals to |
106 |
the OS as I'm not sure if it was Linux or the hardware locking up. |