Re: [gentoo-user] SMART drive test results, 2.0 for same drive as before.

[Bob Wya]

Dale,

As a double check I always like to test "failing" drives with Spinrite:
https://www.grc.com/sr/spinrite.htm

If that software can't recover/access any bits of the drive - it's pretty
much a toaster in my book!

Robert

On 20 January 2015 at 17:58, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:

> Howdy,
>
> This is concerning a hard drive I had issues with a while back.  I been
> using it to do backups with as a test if nothing else.  Anyway, it seems
> to have issues once again.
>
> root@fireball / # smartctl -l selftest /dev/sdd
> smartctl 6.3 2014-07-26 r3976 [x86_64-linux-3.16.3-gentoo] (local build)
> Copyright (C) 2002-14, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke,
> www.smartmontools.org
>
> === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
> SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1
> Num  Test_Description    Status                  Remaining
> LifeTime(hours)  LBA_of_first_error
> # 1  Extended offline    Completed: read failure       40%
> 21406         4032272464
> # 2  Short offline       Completed without error       00%
> 21387         -
> # 3  Short offline       Completed without error       00%
> 21363         -
> # 4  Extended offline    Completed: read failure       40%
> 21343         4032272464
> # 5  Short offline       Completed without error       00%
> 21315         -
> # 6  Short offline       Completed without error       00%
> 21291         -
> # 7  Short offline       Completed without error       00%
> 21267         -
> # 8  Short offline       Completed without error       00%
> 21243         -
> # 9  Short offline       Completed without error       00%
> 21219         -
> #10  Short offline       Completed without error       00%
> 21195         -
> #11  Extended offline    Completed: read failure       40%
> 21174         4032272464
> #12  Short offline       Completed without error       00%
> 21147         -
> #13  Short offline       Completed without error       00%
> 21123         -
> #14  Short offline       Completed without error       00%
> 21099         -
> #15  Short offline       Completed without error       00%
> 21075         -
> #16  Short offline       Completed without error       00%
> 21051         -
> #17  Short offline       Completed without error       00%
> 21026         -
> #18  Extended offline    Completed: read failure       40%
> 21005         4032267424
> #19  Short offline       Completed without error       00%
> 20978         -
> #20  Short offline       Completed without error       00%
> 20954         -
> #21  Short offline       Completed without error       00%
> 20930         -
>
> root@fireball / #
>
> More info:
>
> ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME          FLAG     VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE
> UPDATED  WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
>   1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate     0x000f   116   099   006    Pre-fail
> Always       -       114620384
>   3 Spin_Up_Time            0x0003   092   092   000    Pre-fail
> Always       -       0
>   4 Start_Stop_Count        0x0032   100   100   020    Old_age
> Always       -       39
>   5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0033   053   051   036    Pre-fail
> Always       -       62752
>   7 Seek_Error_Rate         0x000f   080   060   030    Pre-fail
> Always       -       102219639
>   9 Power_On_Hours          0x0032   076   076   000    Old_age
> Always       -       21403
>  10 Spin_Retry_Count        0x0013   100   100   097    Pre-fail
> Always       -       0
>  12 Power_Cycle_Count       0x0032   100   100   020    Old_age
> Always       -       40
> 183 Runtime_Bad_Block       0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age
> Always       -       0
> 184 End-to-End_Error        0x0032   100   100   099    Old_age
> Always       -       0
> 187 Reported_Uncorrect      0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age
> Always       -       0
> 188 Command_Timeout         0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age
> Always       -       0 0 0
> 189 High_Fly_Writes         0x003a   100   100   000    Old_age
> Always       -       0
> 190 Airflow_Temperature_Cel 0x0022   068   063   045    Old_age
> Always       -       32 (Min/Max 23/36)
> 191 G-Sense_Error_Rate      0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age
> Always       -       0
> 192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age
> Always       -       11
> 193 Load_Cycle_Count        0x0032   001   001   000    Old_age
> Always       -       276725
> 194 Temperature_Celsius     0x0022   032   040   000    Old_age
> Always       -       32 (0 17 0 0 0)
> 197 Current_Pending_Sector  0x0012   088   088   000    Old_age
> Always       -       1984
> 198 Offline_Uncorrectable   0x0010   088   088   000    Old_age
> Offline      -       1984
> 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count    0x003e   200   200   000    Old_age
> Always       -       0
> 240 Head_Flying_Hours       0x0000   100   253   000    Old_age
> Offline      -       18810h+14m+31.520s
> 241 Total_LBAs_Written      0x0000   100   253   000    Old_age
> Offline      -       110684232213092
> 242 Total_LBAs_Read         0x0000   100   253   000    Old_age
> Offline      -       92603114597547
>
>
> I thought I would check this thing manually just to be nosy.  When I saw
> the errors, I then got curious as to why I hadn't received a email on
> this issue.  Well, long story short, I changed the password for google
> mail and forgot to change it for that Smtp thing or whatever.  Fixed
> that now.
>
> Anyway, no clue how long this issue has been going on but there it is
> again.  When I google, some places say this is somewhat normal.  Some
> say it needs to be watched and some say the world is coming to a end and
> we are all going to die a horrible death.  Me, I'm thinking this drive
> came out the south end of a north bound something bad, skunk maybe.
> Basically, it stinks and I'm not real happy about it.  :-@
>
> Since this is the 2nd time for this specific drive, thoughts?
>
> By the way, I'm doing a dd to erase the drive just for giggles.  Since
> it ain't blowing smoke, I may use it as a backup still, just to play
> with, until I can get another drive.  I think that moved up the priority
> list a bit now.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Dale
>
> :-)  :-)
>
>
>


-- 

All the best,
Robert