Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Robert Crawford <flacycads@×××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How to make emerge skirt a package built from tar.gz
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 07:43:45
Message-Id: 200512150233.48056.flacycads@cox.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: How to make emerge skirt a package built from tar.gz by reader@newsguy.com
1 On Wednesday 14 December 2005 19:54, reader@×××××××.com wrote:
2 > Robert Crawford <flacycads@×××.net> writes:
3 > > On Wednesday 14 December 2005 09:36, brettholcomb@×××××××××.net wrote:
4 > >> Isn't /etc/package/provides the proper way to do this as inject is
5 > >> deprecated?
6 > >
7 > > It's:
8 > > /etc/portage/profile/package.provided
9 >
10 > Is it really /etc/portage/profile though? All my other `package'
11 > files are at /etc/portage
12 >
13 > ls /etc/portage
14 > package.keywords package.keywords~ package.use package.use~
15 >
16 > I saw the output from emerge posted here and it does say:
17 > /etc/portage/profile/package.provided
18 >
19 > I just wondered if that is deprecated in favor of
20 > /etc/portage/package.provided since all the other package adjustment
21 > files are there and seem to work from there as expected.
22
23
24 /etc/portage/profile/package.provided always works for me. However, I don't
25 know if its location is being changed to /etc/portage/package.provided,
26 where all the other files are placed. I did wonder why package.provided
27 needed a "profile" directory, but have never seen the reason mentioned
28 anywhere.
29
30 R.C.
31 --
32 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list