1 |
On Wednesday 14 December 2005 19:54, reader@×××××××.com wrote: |
2 |
> Robert Crawford <flacycads@×××.net> writes: |
3 |
> > On Wednesday 14 December 2005 09:36, brettholcomb@×××××××××.net wrote: |
4 |
> >> Isn't /etc/package/provides the proper way to do this as inject is |
5 |
> >> deprecated? |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > It's: |
8 |
> > /etc/portage/profile/package.provided |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Is it really /etc/portage/profile though? All my other `package' |
11 |
> files are at /etc/portage |
12 |
> |
13 |
> ls /etc/portage |
14 |
> package.keywords package.keywords~ package.use package.use~ |
15 |
> |
16 |
> I saw the output from emerge posted here and it does say: |
17 |
> /etc/portage/profile/package.provided |
18 |
> |
19 |
> I just wondered if that is deprecated in favor of |
20 |
> /etc/portage/package.provided since all the other package adjustment |
21 |
> files are there and seem to work from there as expected. |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
/etc/portage/profile/package.provided always works for me. However, I don't |
25 |
know if its location is being changed to /etc/portage/package.provided, |
26 |
where all the other files are placed. I did wonder why package.provided |
27 |
needed a "profile" directory, but have never seen the reason mentioned |
28 |
anywhere. |
29 |
|
30 |
R.C. |
31 |
-- |
32 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |