1 |
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Robert Bridge <robert@××××××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> nVidia at the moment is a bit of a risk, as there is a whole raft of |
3 |
> issues going on with nVidia hardware. If their drivers work, they will |
4 |
> likely give better performance and features than AMDs options, and so |
5 |
> long as the hardware holds up. Read up on nVidia bumps issue for more |
6 |
> information. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> However... AMD have an open-source strategy and an official |
9 |
> open-source driver stack. Their open-source drivers are good, and |
10 |
> getting better, but are not feature complete yet, nor really |
11 |
> competitive for performance in 3D games. I'm not aware of any major |
12 |
> issues surrounding AMD graphics, except the general complaints that |
13 |
> the FOSS drivers aren't yet good enough. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> YMMV, |
16 |
> RobbieAB |
17 |
> |
18 |
> |
19 |
|
20 |
Thanks for the pointer on the nvidia problem. I hadn't heard about that, and: |
21 |
|
22 |
1) I've got a 2 year old out-of-warranty Compaq laptop that's having |
23 |
trouble booting. As best I can tell it's not the disk and it's not |
24 |
memory, so... |
25 |
2) I just put a fanless 9500GT-based card in my wife's new machine |
26 |
|
27 |
Guess I'm right in the thick of it as testing for lead vs eutectic |
28 |
bumps is not something you can figure out with a piece of software... |
29 |
|
30 |
I used to work in the semiconductor industry. The thing I'd worry |
31 |
about is whether the company doing packaging for nvidia, and it's |
32 |
almost certainly not nvidia themselves, have used these same high-lead |
33 |
bumps that they sold nvidia. If they have then anyone's chips could |
34 |
potentially have these same problems. |
35 |
|
36 |
OK, so let's investigate AMD/ATI at bit more. Am I understanding |
37 |
Volker's response that I want to look at the 5000 Series from ATI? |
38 |
|
39 |
http://www.amd.com/us/products/desktop/graphics/ati-radeon-hd-5000/Pages/ati-radeon-hd-5000.aspx |
40 |
|
41 |
Looking at NewEgg I think all the 5850 & 5870's are just more |
42 |
expensive than I want to pay. There are some 5730's for around $240, |
43 |
but tax and shipping is going to drive that over $300 which is still |
44 |
pretty step for something I won't use much. |
45 |
|
46 |
As I won't game and sometimes do music (writing, recording, listening, |
47 |
etc.) much I would appreciate quiet (i.e. - fanless) everyday whereas |
48 |
gaming might happen just once in awhile. So far I haven't spotted any |
49 |
5700 or 5800 that are fanless. I do see 5500 and 5600 devices: |
50 |
|
51 |
5570 |
52 |
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814131349 |
53 |
|
54 |
5670 |
55 |
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814131348 |
56 |
|
57 |
Prices are acceptable on both of those, although I'm sure the |
58 |
performance is probably lacking a bit. I'll have to look around at |
59 |
relative benchmarks to understand anything about the performance |
60 |
metrics. |
61 |
|
62 |
Thanks, |
63 |
Mark |