| 1 |
On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 17:54:32 -0700, thelma@×××××××××××.com wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I just tried gscan2pdf. |
| 4 |
> It does not offer auto-feed either; black borders still persist (so it |
| 5 |
> must be an issue with Brother driver. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Sounds like it. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> In addition, I've noticed big difference is scan size of an image. |
| 10 |
> Small receipt size: ~4in x 3in saved as pdf B/W in 200dpi resolution: |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> gscan2pdf produced file size: 66.7kB |
| 13 |
> xsane produce file size: 12.4kB |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
File saving is a different process from scanning. For B/W scans, I use |
| 16 |
djvu with gscan2pdf, the files are *much* smaller. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> So in file size perspective xsane produced much smaller size. |
| 19 |
> gscan2pdf provide crop tool to cut the borders, xsane does not have any |
| 20 |
> crop tools. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Xsane doesn't need to provide image manipulation as it works as a GIMP |
| 23 |
plugin. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
WinErr 01D: System crash - We are unable to figure out our own code. |
Archives