| 1 |
On Monday 15 August 2005 10:18, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 20:37:47 -0400, Paul Hoy wrote: |
| 3 |
> > ~arch is a little scary for me, since it's not in the stable branch. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> That's the whole point. ebuilds need to be thoroughly tested before being |
| 6 |
> marked stable, so you need a testing branch. |
| 7 |
> Without it, your stable branch would not be. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I am a long time ~arch-only user and have/had less problems, than friends |
| 10 |
using the stable tree. Plus if there is a problem, my friends with stable |
| 11 |
will hit it too some days/week later - and I am there 'support', so it is |
| 12 |
good for me, if I already found a solution. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
It is not all about versions. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives