1 |
On Mittwoch 25 Februar 2009, Momesso Andrea wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 09:24:40PM +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
3 |
> > On Mittwoch 25 Februar 2009, Momesso Andrea wrote: |
4 |
> > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 08:03:36PM +0000, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
5 |
> > > > On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:42:13 -0300, Zhu Sha Zang wrote: |
6 |
> > > > > >> Hi! I want to update portage to get new features, mostly sets |
7 |
> > > > > >> for kde4.2. |
8 |
> > > > > |
9 |
> > > > > Hint: EAPI 2 are aquired using portage-2.1.6.7 . portage-2.2... are |
10 |
> > > > > not stable yet. |
11 |
> > > > |
12 |
> > > > No, but they are stable, and required for sets as the OP wanted. |
13 |
> > > > |
14 |
> > > > |
15 |
> > > > -- |
16 |
> > > > Neil Bothwick |
17 |
> > > > |
18 |
> > > > Why is the word abbreviation so long? |
19 |
> > > |
20 |
> > > Doesn't look really stable: |
21 |
> > > |
22 |
> > > # Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> (05 Jan 2009) |
23 |
> > > # Portage 2.2 is masked due to known bugs in the |
24 |
> > > # package sets and preserve-libs features. |
25 |
> > > |
26 |
> > > >=sys-apps/portage-2.2_pre |
27 |
> > |
28 |
> > as long as you don't use the preserved-libs feature (turn it off in |
29 |
> > make.conf) you'll be fine. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> And what about the sets bug? Is it safe to use sets? |
32 |
|
33 |
so far I haven't hit any set bugs - and I am using them a lot. |
34 |
|
35 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=259684 |
36 |
|
37 |
ok - I hit that one. But there is an easy workaround - editing the file by |
38 |
hand. |
39 |
|
40 |
you should look for portage bugs in the gentoo bugzilla and decide for |
41 |
yourself. |