1 |
From: "Richard Fish" <bigfish@××××××××××.org> |
2 |
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] LVM: Pro and Contra ? |
3 |
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:59:02 -0700 |
4 |
|
5 |
> On 8/8/06, Meino Christian Cramer <Meino.Cramer@×××.de> wrote: |
6 |
> > What's about fragmentation of data, when using LVM ? |
7 |
> |
8 |
> There are very few disadvantages. If you put root on LVM, then you |
9 |
> will require an initramfs to boot, and as kashani said, if the LVM |
10 |
> packages break somehow, you will be back to a livecd. However, I |
11 |
> think keeping a backup initramfs and kernel in /boot should be |
12 |
> sufficient for most cases. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> The biggest advantage is that you can easily add more space to a |
15 |
> volume group if you run out. So say you only allocate the 80G you are |
16 |
> currently using to your logical volumes initially, you can add space |
17 |
> to them as required from the unallocated space. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> LVM has no effect on fragmentation however, other than that you can |
20 |
> easily use more and smaller filesystems to keep the effects of |
21 |
> fragmentation managable. When you consider how the different areas of |
22 |
> a gentoo directory tree are used, it makes sense to use different |
23 |
> filesystems for /, /var, /usr/portage, and /home. I also recommend |
24 |
> separate filesystems for /usr/portage/packages and distfiles, just to |
25 |
> keep those large archives out of the same filesystem that contains the |
26 |
> ebuilds. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> -Richard |
29 |
> -- |
30 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
31 |
> |
32 |
|
33 |
Hi Richard ! |
34 |
|
35 |
Thanks a lot for your explanations! :) |
36 |
|
37 |
Yes, the variable size of a LVM was that feature what attracts my |
38 |
attention first. |
39 |
|
40 |
Another question came up in my mind: Is a logical volumes (that |
41 |
"beast" where I put the filesystem on finally) behaviour identical to |
42 |
that of an ordinary old fashioned partion? |
43 |
|
44 |
Is it possible (for example) to feed such an lv again through the |
45 |
device mapper for encryption purposes ? |
46 |
|
47 |
Is the performance impact via LVM (not encryption) noticeable or |
48 |
negliable? |
49 |
|
50 |
Keep hacking! |
51 |
mcc |
52 |
|
53 |
-- |
54 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |