1 |
On 2011-10-04 20:56, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
Replying two mails in one... |
4 |
|
5 |
Dale: |
6 |
>Is grub2 stable, who uses it and can you post your experience on the |
7 |
>switching process? |
8 |
|
9 |
I use it (1.99-rc1, which is gone from Portage) for booting my UEFI |
10 |
(with GPT partition table) motherboard until I can get coreboot running |
11 |
on it... :-) |
12 |
|
13 |
Experience wise it's, well, not much difference than old grub, with the |
14 |
exception of the change in paradigm: you don't edit the config file |
15 |
directly but instead edit "pre-config" files in order to get a working |
16 |
solution. For me the default settings work fine (well, I haven't been |
17 |
able to change the resolution); it finds my installed kernels in /boot |
18 |
and put's them in the boot list (the boot screen list) together with a |
19 |
single user version for rescue operations. IMO, it's over-complicated (I |
20 |
agree with Grant) but if the default settings works (with tweaks) for you... |
21 |
|
22 |
>Was it difficult? Easy? Somewhere between? |
23 |
|
24 |
Hm... Well, see above... |
25 |
|
26 |
Canek: |
27 |
> Me, I want my laptop/desktop computers to have the best resolution |
28 |
> available from moment zero, even before loading the kernel, and not a |
29 |
|
30 |
I agree with this sentiment although I think that the video firmware (or |
31 |
motherboard firmware) should handle this... |
32 |
|
33 |
> single flicker in my screen until my GNOME 3 is fully loaded. So I'm |
34 |
|
35 |
Yes, agree again, although I think Gnome (2,3+) is a festering piece of |
36 |
#%!&... :-) |
37 |
|
38 |
> gonna play with grub2 (or /firstboot, if it materializes) until it's |
39 |
|
40 |
Ok, cool. Please share your experiences. I'll try playing (when I can |
41 |
find the time) with coreboot and FILO: |
42 |
http://www.coreboot.org/Payloads#FILO |
43 |
|
44 |
Best regards |
45 |
|
46 |
Peter K |